<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Open Source on CodeInstances.com</title>
    <link>https://codeinstances.com/tags/open-source/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Open Source on CodeInstances.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://codeinstances.com/tags/open-source/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>CodeInstances Launches as an Open Source Tool That Keeps Program Runs and Replays Them</title>
      <link>https://codeinstances.com/codeinstances-launches-as-an-open-source-tool-that-keeps-program-runs-and-replays-them/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://codeinstances.com/codeinstances-launches-as-an-open-source-tool-that-keeps-program-runs-and-replays-them/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;CodeInstances v0.1.0 is out. It&amp;rsquo;s a small command-line tool that keeps a run of any program as a file and replays it later, with the network replaced by what was recorded. It&amp;rsquo;s open source under the Apache License 2.0 and comes as a single static binary for Linux, macOS and Windows.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The problem it goes after is an old one. Code is kept with great care, in version control, reviewed and tagged. Runs are thrown away. A test fails in CI, someone hits rerun, it passes, and whatever went wrong is gone along with the evidence. An API answers something strange once and never again. A job breaks on Tuesday, and by Wednesday the data it read has moved on.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How a Bug Report Can Arrive as a Runnable CodeInstances File</title>
      <link>https://codeinstances.com/how-a-bug-report-can-arrive-as-a-runnable-codeinstances-file/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://codeinstances.com/how-a-bug-report-can-arrive-as-a-runnable-codeinstances-file/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You maintain a command-line tool that talks to an online service. An issue comes in: &amp;ldquo;sync breaks against our account&amp;rdquo;. You don&amp;rsquo;t have their account. You can&amp;rsquo;t see their data. You ask for logs, then a bigger log, then a screen share, and after a week of back and forth you still haven&amp;rsquo;t seen the failure happen.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The reporter could send the failure itself. If they run your tool under CodeInstances, the run is kept as a file with every request your tool made and every answer their account gave back:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The CodeInstances File Format Is Open JSON With a SHA-256 ID</title>
      <link>https://codeinstances.com/the-codeinstances-file-format-is-open-json-with-a-sha-256-id/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://codeinstances.com/the-codeinstances-file-format-is-open-json-with-a-sha-256-id/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The file is the product. A tool can be replaced, but a run you kept in a format only one tool reads is a run you&amp;rsquo;ll lose eventually. So the instance format is open JSON, written down in full in &lt;a href=&#34;https://github.com/codeinstances/codeinstances/blob/main/docs/FORMAT.md&#34;&gt;FORMAT.md&lt;/a&gt; for anyone who wants to read or write instances with their own tools.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Its name is &lt;code&gt;codeinstances/0&lt;/code&gt;, and that string is the first member of every file. A reader that sees a format version it doesn&amp;rsquo;t know has to refuse the file, and readers ignore members they don&amp;rsquo;t recognise. A file that holds the same member twice, or a known member spelled in another case, is refused. That&amp;rsquo;s how the format can grow without breaking files that already exist.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
